That is where all animation controls effects are controlled. Masking controls btw are in the Effects Control Panel. I'm looking at an array of options in Premiere. In Photoshop you make that selection and 'Crop'. I drew a 4-point shape (although I am baffled why it does not 'snap square' when you hold shift). However, with time, experience, and learning I understand why the difference is there, and I most certainly do not want Pr to look or work like Ps. A version of this question has been asked many times and I have read most of them - they do not answer my question. When I started video post I wanted just to use the same type of tools and was frustrated. I came into video post from 35 years of pro stills work including running a pro portrait photographers lab alongside our studio for 25 years of that. Use the Effects Control panel to change the direction and severity of the crop. Click and drag the effect to a clip in your timeline. Some tools in Pr that seem similar in results to Ps are actually nothing at all like the Ps tool. Use the Effects panel to find the Crop effect. Premiere *has* to work across thousands of images at a time, of different formats/codecs, and so has to have a completely different underlying structure. And yes, there are some abilities within Ps to apply that work on video. Ps is built for working incredibly detailed pixel by pixel modifications on one image at a time or small batches. That would meld well with Premiere Rush CC, a simplified version of Premiere Pro CC. Let alone how differently the apps *have* to work. As Adobe told Engadget during the demo, the aim is to make a labor-free video conversion tool for creators. You may also drag the blue position finder to move through the video. Yes, tfat is blending more these days, but you cant simply take a large user-base app and completely change the UI and the underlying code without causing in itself massive disruption. Play your video until you get to the frame that you want a screenshot of. Amazing tool.The products have all come from very different paths and user groups. However, with time, experience, and learning I understand why the difference is there, and I most certainly do not want Pr to look or work like Ps. Some tools in Pr that seem similar in results to Ps are actually nothing at all like the Ps tool. Let alone how differently the apps *have* to work. It is so slow that it is practically unusable to me. Yes, tfat is blending more these days, but you cant simply take a large user-base app and completely change the UI and the underlying code without causing in itself massive disruption. Today, I have realized, in my laptop (MacBook air 2020 m1 - 16 GB ram) premiere pro being slow. The products have all come from very different paths and user groups.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |